Anything that is gaming related that doesn't fit well anywhere else
User avatar
ElkinFencer10
Next-Gen
 
Posts: 7362
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:34 pm
Location: Henderson, North Carolina

Re: Games Beaten 2016

by ElkinFencer10 Wed Mar 23, 2016 9:19 pm

1. Shadow Warrior - Playstation 4 - January 1
2. The Order: 1886 - Playstation 4 - January 2
3. Dead Rising: Chop Till You Drop - Wii - January 3
4. NyxQuest: Kindred Spirits - WiiWare - January 4
5. Hatsune Miku: Project DIVA F 2nd - Vita - January 5
6. Shadow the Hedgehog - Gamecube - January 9
7. Fairy Bloom Freeia - Steam - January 10
8. Petit Novel Series: Harvest December - 3DS - January 13
9. Gas Guzzlers Extreme - Steam - January 14
10. Muramasa: The Demon Blade - Wii - January 16
11. Project Zero 2: Wii Edition - Wii - January 19
12. Killzone: Liberation - PSP - January 20
13. Sin & Punishment: Star Successor - Wii - January 20
14. Kirby's Epic Yarn - Wii - January 24
15. Sakura Wars: So Long, My Love - Wii - January 25
16. Corpse Party - PSP - January 25
17. Freedom Planet - Wii U - January 25
18. Earth Defense Force 2: Invaders from Planet Space - Vita - January 25
19. Silent Hill: Homecoming - Xbox 360 - January 26
20. Life is Strange - Playstation 4 - January 28
21. Corpse Party: Book of Shadows - PSP - February 2
22. Megadimension Neptunia VII - Playstation 4 - February 12
23. Dr. Discord's Conquest - NES - February 13
24. Corpse Party: Blood Drive - Vita - February 17
25. If My Heart Had Wings - Steam - February 18
26. Missing: An Interactive Thriller - Steam - February 18
27. Her Story - Steam - February 18
28. Fire Emblem Fates: Birthright - 3DS - February 26
29. Saints Row 2 - Steam - March 1
30. Saturday Morning RPG - Playstation 4 - March 3
31. Fire Emblem Fates: Conquest - 3DS - March 6
32. Donkey Kong Country: Tropical Freeze - Wii U - March 8
33. Pokken Tournament - Wii U - March 20
34. Moe Chronicle - Vita - March 22
35. Tom Clancey's The Division - Playstation 4 - March 23

Image

Thanks to some help from Fragems (okay, a LOT of help), I finished The Division's storyline tonight. I feel about The Division a lot the way I felt about Destiny because in a lot of ways, The Division is pretty much Destiny with a smaller budget and a modern setting as opposed to a future sci-fi setting. When I first got the game and started playing it, I thought "Golly gee, this game is swell!" Well, that's what 1950's middle class me would have thought, anyway, but you get the idea. It was super cool. Pseudo-MMO open world post-apocalyptic New York? Heck yes, sign me up.

Image

Then I started playing it more (I sank around, I think 21 hours into the game), and my opinion of the game started to change. Individual missions are interesting, but the overarching plot line is paper thing and horribly disjointed. The larger narrative that these various story missions try to weave is uninspired and uninteresting, and that's really a shame as the game had a lot of potential for great storytelling. I mean, civilization is pushed to the brink of extinction because of a genetically enhanced strain of smallpox. That's some GREAT potential. Unfortunately, the story feels as poorly written and shoehorned in as most recent Call of Duty games (with the exception of Black Ops III).

Not only is the plot paper thin and mostly nonsense, but the game provides very little context in the way of backstory, and what context is given is done through intel reports scattered across the map that you have to find and read. To a certain extent, that's not a bad thing - Fallout and Elder Scrolls establish lore through random text scattered across the world. Fallout and Elder Scrolls do that to build upon the lore and narrative that the game's missions/quests tell, though; The Division does that to establish the background of the story that the missions attempt to tell, and I have a problem with that.

While I'm ripping the game's storytelling to shreds, let's talk about characterization. There isn't any. There are like four or five legitimate characters in the entire game, and by the end of the game, you feel zero attachment to or interest in any of them. They're completely static and flat. No character growth, no character interaction, just different voices telling you things that you probably don't care about when you start and finish a mission. Most of the NPCs in the game barely even count as characters in my book.

Stepping aside from the narrative (or lack thereof), there are some technical gripes I have. I understand that online open world games are a technical challenge, and Ubisoft in general has never had a knack for releasing functional games, but I shouldn't be walking down the street and have five enemies appear out of thin air around me and gang rape me with shotguns before I even realize that they've materialized out of the ether. If your game is touted as a fully online multiplayer experience that requires a constant internet connection, I shouldn't have to wait a full three to five minutes just to connect. It normally only takes 60 seconds or so, but I've waited five solid minutes before I managed to connect to the servers. I get kicked off randomly from time to time, the in-game party chat jumps back and forth between functional and randomly broken more than Hillary Clinton jumps between positions, and the level scaling is as broken as the entirety of Sonic Boom.

Image

To give an example of how FUBAR the level scaling is, I'll tell you what happened when Fragems and I teamed up last week. I was level 13ish, and he was level 30 (the max level). We were in an area that's supposed to have enemies between levels three and five. A bit of level scaling makes sense, right? These ass holes were all level 25, and in this game, anything more than a one level difference means that you'll need a mop to clean up the lower-level person. So these guys are twice my level even though I'm the party leader and the mission is intended for level 12 players. I can't even tell what level they are; as far as I can tell, they're level skull-and-crossbones. I understand the desire to keep the game challenging for higher level players, but I shouldn't die from a single stray bullet from an assault rifle.

Image

My biggest complaint with the game is one that I know is partially invalid since I knew about this before the game even came out, but I hate that the game requires an internet connection and online play. I know it's designed as an online game, and that's fine, but just like with Destiny, I think that there should be an option to play the game's badly written story missions solo offline. All of the enemies are AI anyway. I know that I bought the game knowing full well that it was online or bust, but it just seems needless.

Don't get me wrong - the game's not bad. It's a lot of fun if you're playing with a friend or a few. For someone who wants to get a good story out of a game (or even a decent one), however, it's a big let down, and it is very disappointing in a lot of ways. Ubisoft had some real potential here, and I can't help but feel like a lot of that potential was missed.
Exhuminator wrote:Ecchi lords must unite for great justice.

Image
User avatar
Exhuminator
Next-Gen
 
Posts: 11573
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:24 am

Re: Games Beaten 2016

by Exhuminator Wed Mar 23, 2016 9:28 pm

Loving your new review format Elkin. I don't give a crap about The Division, but your review was written well enough that I read the whole thing. Pretty amusing to see you jump from a panty hunting weeabo game to a dude bro shooter. :lol: Variety is good.
PLAY KING'S FIELD.
User avatar
ElkinFencer10
Next-Gen
 
Posts: 7362
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:34 pm
Location: Henderson, North Carolina

Re: Games Beaten 2016

by ElkinFencer10 Wed Mar 23, 2016 9:33 pm

Exhuminator wrote:Loving your new review format Elkin. I don't give a crap about The Division, but your review was written well enough that I read the whole thing. Pretty amusing to see you jump from a panty hunting weeabo game to a dude bro shooter. :lol: Variety is good.

Thanks man. I'm normally so worn out by the end of the day when I finish games that I don't feel like writing a review, but started to feel like "that guy" since yall do such detailed reviews when you finish games, and I'm just "I beat it."

Never underestimate my eclectic nature. My shuffle goes from Slipknot to Kelly Clarkson to Excision, and my gaming habits are similarly random. 8)
Exhuminator wrote:Ecchi lords must unite for great justice.

Image
User avatar
prfsnl_gmr
Next-Gen
 
Posts: 10037
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:26 pm
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina

Re: Games Beaten 2016

by prfsnl_gmr Wed Mar 23, 2016 10:20 pm

Sarge wrote:Oh dear, except for maybe those... ;)


8 Eyes? Addams a Family? Adventures of Tom Sawyer? Amazon? Astyanax? Bucky O'Hare? Castelian? Castlequest? A Nighmare on Elm Street? Low G Man? Jackie Chan's Action Kung Fu?

All of these are at least OK...
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
 
Posts: 37755
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm

Re: Games Beaten 2016

by noiseredux Wed Mar 23, 2016 10:49 pm

Nightmare On Elm Street rules. Love that game.
Image
User avatar
Sarge
Next-Gen
 
Posts: 7187
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 12:08 pm

Re: Games Beaten 2016

by Sarge Wed Mar 23, 2016 11:09 pm

prfsnl_gmr wrote:
Sarge wrote:Oh dear, except for maybe those... ;)


8 Eyes? Addams a Family? Adventures of Tom Sawyer? Amazon? Astyanax? Bucky O'Hare? Castelian? Castlequest? A Nighmare on Elm Street? Low G Man? Jackie Chan's Action Kung Fu?

All of these are at least OK...

Let's see... I've beaten Fester's Quest, but not Addams Family. I beat Astayanax many moons ago. I also took out Low G Man... last year? I think I also beat Jackie Chan around the same time. And I definitely took out Bucky O'Hare. That game is evil. But at the same time, the checkpointing in the game is spectacular, almost like save-stating.

8 Eyes is one that intrigues me, but I always do terribly at it. I might need to give it another go, and remember that I can't play it like Castlevania. Tom Sawyer is... a'ight, I suppose. I did have a buddy that owned it, and he was pretty good at it. Castlelian I'm only vaguely familiar with (little dragon looking dude outside a tower). I remember Castlequest, and the fact that it came with a map that showed where all the keys are. In a lot of ways, it's really mostly a puzzler, trying to find the right route. Always been a bit fascinated by it, too, so I might give that a go sometime. And I played a bit of Nightmare on Elm Street, it didn't really stand out to me... but maybe I should give it another shot!
Hardcore Retro Gaming - Talk about games ten years old or older!
“History isn't just the story of bad people doing bad things. It's quite as much a story of people trying to do good things. But somehow, something goes wrong.” -- C.S. Lewis
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
 
Posts: 37755
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm

Re: Games Beaten 2016

by noiseredux Wed Mar 23, 2016 11:18 pm

Nightmare is brilliant. In my opinion one of the most unfairly overlooked NES games most likely because it is LJN.
Image
User avatar
Sarge
Next-Gen
 
Posts: 7187
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 12:08 pm

Re: Games Beaten 2016

by Sarge Wed Mar 23, 2016 11:27 pm

Didn't Rare dev it, though? That would explain a lot.
Hardcore Retro Gaming - Talk about games ten years old or older!
“History isn't just the story of bad people doing bad things. It's quite as much a story of people trying to do good things. But somehow, something goes wrong.” -- C.S. Lewis
User avatar
noiseredux
Next-Gen
 
Posts: 37755
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:09 pm

Re: Games Beaten 2016

by noiseredux Wed Mar 23, 2016 11:45 pm

Sarge wrote:Didn't Rare dev it, though? That would explain a lot.


probably? I get the whole LJN/Acclaim/RARE thing mixed up from back then.
Image
User avatar
PartridgeSenpai
Next-Gen
 
Posts: 2165
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2015 9:27 am
Location: Northern Japan

Re: Games Beaten 2016

by PartridgeSenpai Thu Mar 24, 2016 6:38 am

Exhuminator wrote:Loving your new review format Elkin. I don't give a crap about The Division, but your review was written well enough that I read the whole thing. Pretty amusing to see you jump from a panty hunting weeabo game to a dude bro shooter. :lol: Variety is good.


I second this :I
I hope this trend of longer Elken reviews continues :D
I identify everyone via avatar, so if you change your avatar, I genuinely might completely forget who you are. -- Me
Return to General Gaming

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests