the7k wrote:Street Fighter. Street Fighter IV was such a huge step backwards, both in mechanics and presentation, compared to Street Fighter III - or even Street Fighter Alpha. I seriously felt the $15 I spent on SF2HD was much better spent than the $60 I spent on SF4... and I already own multiple versions of SF2.
Soul Calibur, Which each game, it seems to be degrading more and more. SC4 would have actually been better than SC3 in my eyes... except that they got rid of Chronicles of the Sword, what I believed to be the best single-player component in a fighting game ever, in favor of that uninspired Tower crap. That coupled with the disastrous online play... ugh.
As much as I'm sure I'm going against the idea of this thread, I'd like to expand upon these two games in particular, especially because I've always found your thoughts on fighting games particularly insightful in the past.
Now SFIV, I can understand why people say it's a step backwards in terms of mechanics, especially since third strike is often places as the most refined, perfect fighting game of all time, but what did you find wrong about the presentation, while I'm on the topic do you also think that SSFIV was a misstep for the series?
As for Soul Caliber, I whole heartedly agree that the "tower crap" was not only a lazy substitute for the series normal robust and entertaining single player game play (something I find exceedingly rare in fighting games, which makes this mistake sting all the worse), but also completely forgettable. However, I have not trifled with online play on SCIV, only head to head with friends and found the game extremely enjoyable that way, and as somebody who I believe has often defended KOFXI for the same reason (though I could be wrong), do you think that it is still a good game at it's core?
Also, to keep things going smoothly here for this thread, Call of Duty has been dissapointing me ever since 2, sonic since adventure, midway since abandoning the smash tv/ total carnage franchise (not fair, I know.) and silent hill since 2.