Xonticus wrote:and sometimes you hear kids spouting crap, like saying old games take no skill, or 2D platformers cannot compare to their 3d siblings because it is "newer"
well yeah, that's just stupid baby crap.
Xonticus wrote:and sometimes you hear kids spouting crap, like saying old games take no skill, or 2D platformers cannot compare to their 3d siblings because it is "newer"
noiseredux wrote:Xonticus wrote:and sometimes you hear kids spouting crap, like saying old games take no skill, or 2D platformers cannot compare to their 3d siblings because it is "newer"
well yeah, that's just stupid baby crap.
Anayo wrote:The 16-bit days were not glory days. The glory days are TODAY.
Anayo wrote:The 16-bit days were not glory days. The glory days are TODAY.
IIICCCPIII wrote:
When people say '07 was one of the greatest gaming years ever, i flat out don't get it.
ShadicChao wrote:Im young AND I HATE them too. I wanna learn if a retro is good
id rather see a 20+ year old review saying he got it as present then some kid who is younger than myself saying he found it at a yard sale.
noiseredux wrote:I think we're doing a lot of generalizing. Age really doesn't matter if the reviewer has done his homework and presents the info well.
And though it's easy to say all young kids have bad taste, I recently heard a kid about 8 yrs old browsing the GBA section of a Gamestop tell his dad that he couldn't decide between Ice Climber or Metroid. So there's definitely hope.
noiseredux wrote:ShadicChao wrote:Im young AND I HATE them too. I wanna learn if a retro is good
id rather see a 20+ year old review saying he got it as present then some kid who is younger than myself saying he found it at a yard sale.
you trust people over 30?