CRTGAMER wrote:Ziggy587 wrote:In particular, the SNES Defining Games article always bothered me a bit. Uniracers might be a hidden gem, but it's certainly not a defining game.
So I guess my question for you is, would you mind if we updated and/or rewrite some of the old entries?
I'm kinda leaning that Uniracers could be valid in both categories. This is due to the game exclusive to the SNES. For the ones that know the game, it is synonymous with the SNES. On the other hand, many today are familiar with only the more traditional such as Mario, Kirby and Donkey Kong making Uniracers also a discovered hidden gem.
I don't know about that. We might have to define what "defining" means here (no pun intended). I grew up with the SNES and I never heard of it until I read the article here. In fact, if it weren't for RB, I
still wouldn't know about it! I've never seen it on any SNES lists or YouTube videos (of which I've seen my fair share of). It was only just recently that I saw a Cinemassacre video where Mike Matei referred to it as an obscure SNES game. Know one I knew had the game. I never saw it for sale in any store. I never saw it for rent in any rental shop, which includes the big ones like Blockbuster as well as the Ma and Pa shops (of which there were a lot of in the 90's).
Sorry to any Uniracers fans if it sounds like I'm shitting on your favorite game, but I'm not. I just don't see how it could possibly be considered a *defining* game for the console. I totally get it if you were one of the few that knew about the game that when YOU think of the SNES it's one of the games that you think of. So for another example, E.V.O. meant a lot to me when I was young. Of course, it was unheard of back then, but it's one of my favorites for the SNES (one of
my defining SNES games) but I can understand how it's not a defining game for the console as a whole. That's why I can safely say that (and you might wanna sit down for this) Earthbound should also not be on the defining games list. Earthbound and E.V.O. are very similar, being unheard of games back when with less than stellar sales, and only gained recent notoriety and popularity due to the Internet and the retro game craze. That's why I use it as an example.
Sorry to derail, and I'll get off my soap box in a minute, I'd just like to make this one point. The Defining Games articles need to have some standard, otherwise they just become someone's Top X list.