pierrot wrote:samsonlonghair wrote:NES is the only console designed to run on AC power
I see where you're coming from, and maybe it's simpler to state it in those terms, but I think it's a little disingenuous to say that the NES runs on AC. The NES's wall wart is only a transformer, and it's AC power at the barrel jack, sure, but it's still converted to DC (internally) before powering any of the other circuitry.
Granted. This is exactly correct. The NES does convert AC to DC internally rather than at the wall wart. I apologize if I seemed disingenuous when I simplified the matter.
It's a strange design for sure. I can see why an industrial designer might choose to put the power adapter completely outside the device or completely inside the device. Buy why do part of the power adapting outside the NES and part of the power adapting inside? It's just so weird, you know?
pierrot wrote:It's just that the rectifier and ripple filter are in the console, rather than the brick, in the case of the NES. There are a number of ways to rectify an AC signal, though, and the NES has one of the most unconventional rectifier circuits I've ever seen. At first glance it looks like it should just be a standard diode bridge rectifier, but it's actually in a configuration like transil packages on an inductive load, to suppress back-emf. Far as I can tell, they were just trying to get up to 13V (unregulated) for the RF circuit. Not entirely sure why they couldn't have just used a transformer with a different turns ratio, though--.
Fascinating. I appreciate your analysis. You clearly know more about the subject of rectifiers than I do. I tip my fancy hat to you, sir!
racketboy wrote:So not being an electrical-gifted person, what should I look for in sourcing these things?
I would look at user reviews from end users who have used the product for many years. I think longevity is the true test of build quality.